Difficult fragment about language

[Enjolras]

On the question of the insistence of the question of “who?”, does the emphasis placed on it for you stem from science (I’m thinking physics -"relativity") and not exclusively that of a philosophical discourse (if for a moment we consider the two courses as radically separate)?

Enjolras

[sparkinthedark]

On the question of the insistence of the question of “who?”, does the emphasis placed on it for you stem from science (I’m thinking physics -"relativity") and not exclusively that of a philosophical discourse (if for a moment we consider the two courses as radically separate)?

Enjolras

From a philosophical discourse. The human being is a unity in the same way a little village is a unity.
I certainly don't make use of the classical concept of "subject", but sometimes I use the word "who" (metaphorically, in a non essentialist way) when I'm talking about someone who has immanent power, whose "mind may enjoy very special relations established between effects in a situation of pure exteriority". That's not really a "who", but deserves to be called that way.