My computer just fried because of the internet 2010 maleware, it died on the operating table at staples this past weekend- hence the mini computer.
I actually have written quite a few books and commentaries, and am in the process of rewritting them- I don't make backups unless I am willing to let anyone just stumble across them, here are the books and papers:
-------------------------------
Short stories
--------------------------------
The Wheel of Atlantis
And other short stories of
Exploration, Horror, and Reflection
---------------------
Books
---------------------
Eclipse of the Monolith
Under the Sun, Under the Moon
The City
Commentary to the Iron Heel
Commentary to the Seawolf
Commentary and Guide to ‘The Campaign of Hannibal’
Commentary on the Jugunthine War
Reflecting on Boyd and Du Picq
Turbulent Wisdom- A Guide to the Perplexed
Commentary to ‘The Brother’s Grimm’
Against the Barrel of the Gun- A Brief History
Cycles of Tyranny
The Progressive Navigation of Conflict
Commentary to ‘Erewhon’
---------------------------------------------
Papers
---------------------------------------------
Why Interpersonal Communication Sucks
Axiomatic Approaches to the Unorthodox, and Their Limitations
The Nature of Tongs, Cliques and Coups
Why Elitist Snobs Should all Off Themselves
Mao Vs Xiaoping- approach to the Military Classics
Limitations and Hazards of Bureaucracies
Limitations and Hazards of Anarchism
Limitations and Hazards of Political Parties
Limitations and Hazards of Dynastic Government
Limitations and Hazards of Elected Government
Limitations and Hazards of Law
Limitation and Hazards of Ambiguity and Enforcement
The Sand Reckoner, and the nature of Higher Erratic Logic
Intuition, Gestalt, Volumnic Awareness, and the Senses- a new look towards the OODA Loop
I have done more over the years (a few good, most fucking horrible- I mean really bad- really fucking bad)- and some of the above books are just strings of paragraphs inside of a outline I didn't feel comfortable enough yet having people read but have largely formulated for discussions with people so often that the formulation feels like a book, and I literally reference to it in my mind like I would to any other book I've read, and at times I sit down and pump them out parts at a time. Since my computer is dead, I have to retype everything once again here anyway, so it gives me a chance to make revisions to the overall structure and even the style, as well as go into some things more indepth. So I am pretty much now up every night with the above titles, fast rewriting them incase I ever do have to present the ideas in a more formal fashion or for emergency money (Sun Tzu's Art of War was presented in a similar fashion, he was asked a few questions, and presented his texts fully thought out from memory that way- every night for the last week I have been retyping The Wheel of Atlantis from memory, as well as adding one new story- it's all fictionalish, part truth and mostly fiction, outside of Jack London I rarely read fiction so this is my attempt to get more use to it):
The Wheel of Atlantis
And other short stories of
Exploration, Horror, and Reflection
Table of Contents:
The Wheel of Atlantis
A passenger on a cutter in the 19th century flees his ship in a rage of madness into the sea during a storm, seeking to escape his crime of passion and his insanity in downing, in the attempt to drown, he suffers from anxiety and fear of death, and with the sudden surge to live thrashes against all odds and time to survive only to black out in the end. Waking up, at first joyful, brings a ever greater anxiety and self tormenting hatred of not just his past, but also his new predicament in being trapped on isolated sea rock without shelter or provisions, exposed to the unrelenting bombardment of the surf and the brutal sun, and a conscious that refuses to stop.
Karnak
A story that takes place during the final hours in the life of the last man; in pondering and exploring the ruins that lay around him, he searches his memories with a detailed examination the events stretching from his four generations long life as the first born in a unexpected and previously unknown technological refuge self titled as Karnak. In his walk, he explores his youth, marriage, fatherhood, maturity, and interpersonal civil strife that leads to the society’s unexpectant dramatic and apocalyptic ruin.
Shades of Death
A drifter stays in a molding, abandoned house in the woods outside of a new town for a week while looking for work, and begins by slow accident to unravel the mystery of what happened to the homes original inhabitants, and why everything was still intact after decades of apparent abandonment.
The Easel and the Crow
A town’s historian investigates into his community’s long ago lost of their small museum in a fire in a small Pennsylvania town twenty years earlier, leading him to talk to the town’s oldest inhabitant and wife of the former museum director, leading him to unraveling a increasingly dark and gruesome secret kept hidden by two prominent families mentioned to a obscure entry from the lone journal to survive dating back to the French and Indian War.
The Tin Tower
A American deserter returning back to his unit in Iraq, in the triangle of death, at the height of the surge is forced on near continuous guard duty, meeting fellow misfits and exploring the oddities and backwardness within his FOB, and exploring the character of it’s soldiers. Reworking the events surrounding the string of attacks against his FOB he increasingly witnesses, noting a pattern, he tracks down the four Iraqi workers who were plotting and communicating from within the base in helping to guide the attacks, and struggles against the general malaise felt by both sides of the soldiery, his regulars he patrols with and the increasingly depressed command element from investigating or taking seriously his theory and insight into what was actually going on.
Fog and Doubt
Chronically suffering from combined states of awareness and dreaming without experiencing any apparent sleep for months at end, a electrician analyses his failing relationships with loved ones in a surreal dreamstate and tries to comprehend why his ex wife tried to commit suicide on him…. leading him into ever greater doubts and judgments against him as to his past and awareness, pondering if his appraisal of reality he was insane or if everyone he was attracted to was.
The Dragon’s Lost Son
A preschooler denied the right to play with the older children while visiting a friend across town runs away repeatedly from his home, crossing a city and industrial jungle to find the place beyond a barb wire fence where the older kids claim a fearsome dragon living in a cavern only they can approach lives.
Summit of Dreams
A group of homeless and physically disable people living in a abandoned park in the industrial sector of town in Anchorage, Alaska ponder their situation, and wonder what exists in the buildings that lay at the top of the mountain above them, and their journey of exploration, harassment, repeated disappointment and eventual success in trying to reach it and it’s bountiful fields of mushrooms and berries before the snowfall against all odds.
The Ghosts of our Ancestors
A young college student, engaged to a geneticist, turns his back upon religion upon embracing her vision of evolution and science that he reasonably agreed upon with her and everyone else as largely correct, but in time begins to question not so much his leaving his old belief as struggling to reconcile the memories of ghosts he had encountered in his uncle’s house as a toddler, and his families spirituality of interpreting these events and moments that sits still strong in him, challenging the ever deeper beliefs and memories he finds increasingly hard to negate.
The Painting of St. Hilarion
A stoic man who three decades earlier in the late nineteen-thirties was institutionalized in a mental hospital with a crazed surrealist returns after a eerie find during the auction of a man’s art collection that matches the description of tortures and sins he was told years earlier by his old roommate. Seeking to decipher the meaning of the enigmatic and disturbing work, he begins to unravel circumstances that when followed to their conclusion may very well threaten to return him as a unwilling patient of this increasingly unpleasant institution.
A Beginning and it’s End
A soldier before his deployment looks out into Cook Bay from a mountainside and wonders about his eventual deployment with his girlfriend, and after the deployment, returning over a year later culturally shocked by his experiences and completely alone to this spot he had a year before pondered his future from.
A lot of my ideas expressed as of late given his new found interest in talking to Cezar comes from Cycles of Tryanny, The Progressive Navigation of Conflict (which is tables I talk about to people Orally, but has increasingly become more and more solidified structurally), and my newer book Eclipse of the Monolith. The Cycles of Tyranny is a social mathematics describing in detail how societies transition in and out of tyrannical states, and what the expected departures of norms should be by analysis via a cyclic matrix what the paradigms will be in each paradigm, and how they intersect. Back when I first joined this site, I mentioned a few of the titles of these books, as well as small parts of them- plus how I was working on a massive work to Machiavelli- those works are not dead (as you can see, Under the Sun, Under the Moon) except for the work on Machiavelli (which covered ALL his writings I could get my hands on)- it's because once I started getting into reading up on Nietzsche I shit myself discovering that a lesser and dimmer branch of the tradition was advocating consistently aspects when put together came out all fucked up, ass backwards, and seemed somehow to of chosen Maliciousness as their standard- which is so fucking stupid it's not funny- it's not even a value judgment on my part, it's a technical diagnosis of long term failure, and is all the more laughable for it.
The other major problem with publishing something like my insight to Machiavelli's writings or Cycles of Tyranny (which took a good bit initially from a initial reflection on the above works of Machiavelli as well as other works)- is in it's current format is that though it has many parallels to other forms of government, it does not touch upon the rest in the same equal nature or analysis, and thus would appear as both a advocacy and a apology written for just such a government.
This is obvious given the name of it- but if I release it first, it's going to attract the wrong crowd as it straddles and analysis alot of taboo organizations like dictatorships arising from coups and totalitarian vice police not judgmentally as right or wrong, but what can actually happen dynamically via explanations of the theoretical as well as historical- this fills me with a odd mixture of pride, worry, and finally massive concern for our society- as we spend trillions of dollars on educational facilities- and they produced unusable dribble- and also worry that if I do write, the harm arising will outweigh the good as meritocratic bureaucracies are fast becoming the standard solution to problems- even if they can't make returns from the investment put into them and actually manage to insure alot of problems remain issues and permanently unsolved by principle. Obama is of this tradition- the Europeans have it worst- such a system in and of itself is prone to breakdowns in meaningful coordination and technical and compenant capacity to meet the EVOLVING challenges presented to them- they think if they grow large enough, the universe will conform to them- I swear to god, I feel the pain of the Gnostics when they curse the hierarchy of god when I am confronted by a bureaucracy not properly understood and controlled my misfits who rose by the principles left to them and poorly understand how and why they relate into the greater whole..... the shit isn't principle based, it's not axiom based, nor is it emotional- it's human relation and capacity based. You take the human factor of the aim, and they turn into the most high minded and deeply disturbing force I have ever observed in the history of man- capable of more destruction and delusion than even the most twisted of tyrants....
This all being said, I have never seen any writer come close to approaching my insight to it- but it does not mean I have a preference to it anymore than a mechanical historian has knowledgeable about old redundant systems of technology- he might know all and be able to explain it in a book with more depth and understanding than others- but would necessarily choose to go along with what he himselves thinks to be a naturally insufficent system- no matter how well he knows it or can streamline and update it? Probably not- It's one thing to design a better plow, quite another to want to plow a field with it.
Another problem is, we have a few tryanies still current in our world today-the technical insight it would offer would aid in a good many systems to survive and legitimize that otherwise would be dying off in this current age..... hence probably why there are no other works I consider equal- people kept their mouth shut, kept it secret, or got rid of it at the first chance.
If I do ever release it, it will probably be a sub-application of The Eclipse of the Monolith, with a wide diversity of anatomies of various systems from history and using historical examples as a highlighter of how the math works via a explanation of the greater anatomy via their parts, the tactical pros and cons in terms of fluidity from one paradigm to the next, as well as modern day known psychological reactions and reaction of populations intellectually- if I release just the cycles of tyranny, it will have a effect massively worst than Machiavelli's early release of The Prince with a variety of numbskulls, meatheads, and dipshits (not going to name any one here on the forums save for the dead.... cough Nietzsche cough cough) who think themselves as strategists but lack the mental capacity, and have to overly rely on the paradigms left behind by others, and lack all capacity to see beyond it- because they were incapable of formulating it in the first place. The whole though of helping parasites grow ills me, so if I ever do it, it will have to be in terms of a much larger work. That's all I need is to google my name and see some head of the vice police in Mecca or a strongman incharge of the docks in the Congo use my work and twist it to his needs of excusing his actions.
I only bring up such topics because predominately Cezar- or if I come across a absurd statement by Nitz or someone else, or a occasional deserving question from a random person. Cezar has a growing interest in strategic writing which I find rather surprising as it requires a level of awareness quite the opposite of dogmatic thinking and narrow minded associations he is seemingly quite addicted to (read any of his replies to me, you will see what I mean- I'll paint him a mona lisa, and he sneer and declare the true answer to be Nietzsche said)- this is a bit worrisome as he is stuck within the constructs of another mind who died in another age, and when trapped within this paradigm I have the severest of doubts as to his capacity to break out and construct other ones at will- and think in terms of being able to use them tactically (yes, the tactical application of tactics- grand tactics) and not be used by them. This is a necessary cornerstone for strategic thinking, and if he can't or won't construct his own yet.... it causes me the same confusion as when I see in cartoons twenty clowns try to fit into one really small car..... I am attracted to the oddity, not certain it would work, but some part of me say they must have a gameplan and they might just pull it off...... and...... and..... they don't, because you can't really do that in real life. But who knows, if he pulls it off, more power to him.
So the approach when I present them to him- as he is trying to learn a system I am exceptionally skilled in, they shouldn't be presented as a fact just to be accepted but more like a string of koans that identifies pathways and points in the mind and gives suggestions to just how wide that section of consciousness really is in grappling with any kind of formulative knowledge. Is what I am saying still correct.... yes- wouldn't say it if it wasn't, but naturally is open up to debate- but debate isn't the main purpose, knowing the necessary parameters of the brain to even think in such a manner is in the first place. I have full confidence I can jump into a time machine, and not just travel back in time and talk to any mind on the such as Machiavelli, but also far into the future- pick a random topic in our vision for analysis and debate, and not just hold my own, but also contribute greatly to the discussion in delightful and unique ways, while maintaining a common mode of thinking that they can relate to. It's the ability to think like that is what counts- not hiding and suckling from the bosom of such a mind for the rest of your existence.... you do them no honor by such a disgraceful and self-limiting action, and though their name may be teached and preached, their trade and way of seeing the world dies a little bit more because of this action- and thus their only worthwhile and tangible connection to the world.
One of those books I mentioned I am not writing by choice, kinda have been strong armed into it. My mentioning of seeing the giant bag of a lifetime of research by a professor comes to mind when I look over this- or think about works lost to history- everyone of these count to me, explores a part of my thinking I may rank higher and lower than that of another, but in the end, it doesn't really matter to anyone else.... it's just a big stinking bag destined to be chucked out with the trash shortly after death. Hence why I am not too much into publishing my own philosophy- parts of it is awesome, but it is awesome to a select group of people, and I have my doubts about a good many of them. I generally look out for the common good, but trust no one these days- sure the fuck ain't gonna trust them.
I also did some poetry online for a while, but discovered I was indeed as bad as I always assumed I was in it, not surprising as I generally dislike reading the crap to begin with.... but I gave it a shot.
All the more reason to ban me, or make Cezar my Serf.